Software Tester Interview

Can you explain the difference between black-box testing and white-box testing?

Show the black box testing is conducted by the testers which are not aware of the coding part of the software and the white box testing is considered by the conducted by the developers which have the knowledge of the coding which are in the software

Your answer accurately captures the core concept of both black-box and white-box testing but could be improved with more clarity and detail. Here’s a breakdown of your response:

1. Clarity: You correctly state that black-box testing involves testers who are not aware of the internal workings of the code. However, you could specify that this type of testing focuses on input-output validation and the functionality of the software from an end-user perspective.

2. White-box testing: You mention that white-box testing is conducted by developers who understand the code. It's important to note that this approach tests the internal structures or workings of an application, such as code coverage, paths, conditions, and loops.

3. Completeness: Your answer could benefit from examples of each testing type. For instance, black-box testing could include scenarios like user interface testing or functional testing, while white-box testing could involve unit testing or integration testing.

4. Terminology: Ensure that your terminology is precise. Using terms like "conducted by" can be vague; clarify that developers perform white-box testing to verify and validate code functionality, while testers perform black-box testing to ensure the application meets requirements.

To improve your answer, consider restructuring it for better flow and adding specific examples.

Overall, I would rate your answer a 3/5. It touches on the key points but lacks depth and clarity. Adding more details and examples would enhance its effectiveness significantly.

What is a test case, and what are the essential components that you think should be included in one?

Artist case is a group of steps to be executed for check the functionality or a feature and its components are describes ID then we have test data like priority and 70 and then we have a description section and we have then free condition section then after we have a tips after that we have expected result

Your answer touches on the key elements of a test case, but there are areas for improvement in both clarity and completeness. Here is an evaluation of your response:

1. Clarity and Accuracy: You mentioned "artist case," which seems to be a typographical error. The correct term is "test case." Clear and precise language is crucial in interviews, especially for a role in software testing.

2. Essential Components: You’ve identified some important components, such as:
- Test Case ID: A unique identifier for the test case.
- Test Data: Data necessary to execute the test.
- Description: A brief overview of what the test case will validate.
- Preconditions: Conditions that must be met before executing the test case.
- Expected Results: What the outcome should be to consider the test case passed.

However, you omitted other critical components, such as:
- Test Steps: Specific actions to be taken during the test execution.
- Priority: Importance level of the test (High, Medium, Low).
- Actual Result: The result obtained after execution, used for comparison with the expected result.

3. Structure: Your response could benefit from a more organized structure. Presenting your points in a list or a more coherent flow enhances understanding.

To improve your answer, consider restructuring it and incorporating omitted components. For example: "A test case is a detailed document outlining the steps to verify a specific functionality in the application. Essential components include:
- Test Case ID
- Test Steps
- Test Data
- Description
- Preconditions
- Expected Result
- Actual Result
- Priority"

Overall, I would rate your answer 3/5. It covered some basics but lacked clarity, completeness, and organization. By refining your language and including all components, you will deliver a stronger and more comprehensive response in future interviews.

Describe a situation in which you had to deal with a challenging bug. How did you approach fixing it?

Here is a short example of challenging bag how I takled Synergy thought put multi thread sense of pipeline intermitted dropped critical data is per dic and seriously had to reproduce approach I did for that I did comprehensive login with thread Ids and time stains to trade the date of flow then I created a heavy load test environment to reliability are produced and used that sanitize TV live

Your answer addresses the question by presenting a challenging bug and describing some actions taken to troubleshoot it. However, there are several areas where clarity and structure could be improved to enhance its effectiveness.

1. Clarity and Structure: Your response contains several grammatical errors and unclear phrases, which could confuse the interviewer. For instance, "challenging bag" should be "challenging bug," and "Synergy thought put multi thread sense of pipeline intermitted dropped critical data is per dic" is difficult to understand. A clear example should be straightforward and well-structured.

2. Approach: While you mention creating comprehensive logs and a heavy load test environment, you could elaborate more on the specific steps you took. Describing what tools or methods you used to resolve the bug, as well as any collaborative efforts with other team members, will provide a fuller picture of your problem-solving abilities.

3. Outcomes: It is also beneficial to include the outcome of your efforts. Did you successfully resolve the bug? How did your solution impact the project or the team? Mentioning the success gives closure to your story and demonstrates the value of your work.

4. Technical Detail: Use more commonly accepted terminology and protocols in testing, allowing the interviewer to understand your expertise better.

To improve your answer, consider using the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) to structure your responses in a more coherent way. Start with a brief description of the situation, outline the specific actions you took, and conclude with the result or lesson learned.

I would rate your answer 2/5. Reorganizing your thoughts, improving clarity, and adding more detail about your actions and outcomes would make your response stronger and more impactful.