Business & System Analyst Interview

Interview Question:

Can you tell us about a time when you used a business analysis technique to identify and solve a problem for a project?

Candidate's Answer:

Verifying Requirements for a Reconciliation
1. Stakeholder Review:

Conducted meetings with the operation team, Reconciliation, IT department, and compliance team to review the initial requirements for the create terminal terminal in xceptor and create the output and move to TLM
.
Collected feedback and identified areas where additional details were needed.
2. Requirement Walkthroughs:

Organized a series of walkthrough sessions with SMEs from different departments.
Discussed each requirement in detail, focusing on functionality, security, and compliance aspects.

4. Consistency and Completeness Checks:

Cross-checked the requirements against the project’s business objectives and other related requirements.
Identified and filled in gaps, ensuring all scenarios and edge cases were covered.
5. Validation through Test Cases:

Developed test cases based on the requirements, covering different usage scenarios.
Collaborated with the QA team to review and refine the test cases.
6. Requirements Approval:

Presented the final set of requirements, along with the feedback and changes made, to the product owner and project sponsor.
]
Obtained formal sign-off and documented the approval process.
By following this structured process, you can ensure that the requirements are thoroughly verified, minimizing the risk of issues during development and implementation.

Evaluation:

Your answer demonstrates a strong understanding of business analysis techniques and how they can be applied to solve problems in a project setting. You have provided a clear and concise example of how you used various techniques such as stakeholder review, requirement walkthroughs, consistency and completeness checks, and validation through test cases to ensure that the requirements were thoroughly verified.

One suggestion for improvement would be to provide more specific details about the project and the problem that was being addressed. This will help the interviewer to better understand the context and scope of your work. Additionally, you could also mention any challenges or obstacles you faced during this process and how you overcame them.

Overall, I would rate your answer a 4/5. You have provided a thorough and well-structured response, but it could benefit from more specific details and examples to make it even stronger.

Interview Question:

How do you prioritize requirements and determine their level of importance for a project?

Candidate's Answer:

Using techniques
moscow
Register - must
login - must
book tickets - must
seat selection- should
make payments- should
buy refreshments- could


Ranking techniques

Register - 1
login - 2
book tickets - 3
seat selection- 4
make payments- 5
buy refreshments- 6

Evaluation:

Your answer is good because you have mentioned both MoSCoW and ranking techniques to prioritize requirements. This shows that you are familiar with different techniques and can use them effectively in a real project scenario.

The MoSCoW technique stands for Must, Should, Could, and Won't, which helps in identifying and prioritizing requirements based on their criticality and importance. By using this technique, you have identified "Register" and "Login" as must-have requirements, which means they are essential for the project's success. Similarly, "Book tickets" is also a must-have requirement, but slightly less critical than the previous two.

Next, you have used a ranking technique to prioritize the remaining requirements. By assigning a numerical value to each requirement, you have given a clear indication of their level of importance. This technique can be helpful when there are multiple requirements that fall under the same category, and you need to determine their order of importance.

To improve your answer, you can provide a brief explanation of why you have ranked each requirement in a particular order. This will add more clarity to your answer and showcase your thought process behind prioritizing the requirements.

Overall, I would rate your answer 4.5/5. You have covered all the necessary points and demonstrated your knowledge of prioritization techniques effectively. With a little more explanation, your answer can be more comprehensive and score a perfect 5/5.