Full Stack Interview
Angular Question(s) & Actual Evaluation
Please refer to the evaluation for more insight.
-
Classification: Full Stack
-
Topic(s): Angular
Can you describe your experience with both frontend and backend development? Which stack have you found to be the most effective for your projects?
Candidate's Answer:My name is Ashok kya hello
Evaluation:Your answer, "my name is Ashok kya hello," does not respond to the interviewer's question at all. Instead of addressing your experience with frontend and backend development, you've introduced yourself in an informal manner, which is not appropriate in a formal interview context.
The question asked for not only your experience in both areas but also for your thoughts on which technology stack has been effective in your projects. A well-structured answer would cover specific technologies you've worked with, such as Angular for the frontend, and a backend technology like Node.js, Django, or Ruby on Rails. You should also mention any relevant projects that highlight your skills in both areas, as well as reasons for favoring a particular stack.
To improve your answer, you might say something like:
"My name is Ashok, and I have extensive experience in both frontend and backend development. For frontend, I primarily use Angular due to its robust features, such as two-way data binding and a modular architecture. On the backend, I often work with Node.js, which complements Angular well due to its JavaScript foundation, enabling seamless data exchange. In my recent project, I built a full-stack application that allowed users to manage tasks efficiently. I found the MERN stack (MongoDB, Express, React, Node.js) particularly effective in improving performance and user experience. I believe that integrating technologies that work well together is key to successful project outcomes."
This answer directly addresses the question and demonstrates your expertise. I would rate your original answer a 1/5, as it did not provide relevant information. An improved response could easily rate a 4 or 5/5, depending on depth and detail.